For product designers

Design review that stays on the design.

Bring agent-built prototypes, flow write-ups and critique notes into one frame, so every comment points at the exact screen and every iteration stays comparable.

Original illustration. “Trail Kit” is a fictional app used for this example.

Review scenarios

Where a frame helps design teams.

  1. 01

    Flow critique

    Walk through a prototype screen by screen and pin feedback to the state that needs work, instead of describing it in a thread.

    • Comments carry the screen and element they refer to
    • One issue per comment, so each can be resolved
    • Severity labels from the design review template
  2. 02

    Iteration compare

    Put v2 next to v3 and talk about the delta, not the whole design again.

    • Versions sit on one timeline
    • Resolved comments stay with the version they shaped
    • Notes explain what changed and why
  3. 03

    Handoff with rationale

    Ship the decisions with the design: what changed, what was rejected and what is parked for later.

    • Decision log at the end of every review
    • Open questions have an owner
    • Engineers read the final version, not a chain of exports

A review round

From prototype to decision.

How the planned workflow fits together. In the preview, you can try the review part locally.

  1. 1

    Generate or export the prototype

    An agent or a design tool produces HTML, images or a write-up of the flow.

  2. 2

    Open it in a review frame

    The planned product would publish it as one page with versions. The demo shows this locally.

  3. 3

    Collect pinned critique

    Reviewers comment on the exact screen and mark severity.

  4. 4

    Iterate and compare

    The next version arrives beside the last, with resolved comments in place.

Try a review round on a sample brief.

The demo runs in your browser. No account, no upload, nothing to install.